Peer Review Process

REVIEW PROCEDURES

InCASST 2023 uses a double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer's and author's identities are concealed throughout the review process. The review process is expected to take one (1) to two (2) weeks. The following are the four main steps of the review process.

1. The completed manuscript uploaded by the author(s) to the InCASST website is then assigned by the Section Editor to see the editorial process.
2. The editor will invite reviewers to assess and judge the submitted manuscript properly.
3. The result of the review will be communicated to the editor for onward transmission to the author(s).

If required, the author(s) will revise the manuscript in light of the reviewers' comments and suggestions and resubmit the manuscript. When the manuscript is finally accepted, the editor will schedule the publication and inform the author(s).

REVIEW POINT

InCASST is committed to publishing innovative and sustainable research results with an open-access peer-reviewed process that mediates the dissemination of academicians, researchers, and practitioners in engineering, science, and technology. InCASST uses a double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer's and author's identities are concealed throughout the review process. The review process is expected to take one (1) to two (2) weeks. The scopes of InCASST are engineering design, manufacturing, energy management, IT for innovation enhancement, and advanced mathematics.

REVIEWERS

InCASST has recruited reputation and professional reviewers from universities and institutions worldwide, such as India, Singapore, Thailand, Japan, etc. InCASST is committed to ensuring the review process is done without conflict of interest and to ensuring the scientific process's rigorous standards by participating in the peer-review system. Reviewers uphold the integrity of the manuscript by identifying invalid research and helping to help prevent ethical breaches by identifying plagiarism, research fraud and other problems by dint of their familiarity with the subject area.

Archive Access Policy

The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.

STEERING COMMITTEE

• Jihnyoung Lee, Konkuk University, South Korea
• Iping Liang, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan
• M. Luisa Torres Reyes, University of Santo Tomas, Philippines
• Vincenz Serrano, Ateneo De Manila University, Philippines
• Paulus Sarwoto, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Novita Dewi, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Dalan Mehuli Paranginangin, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Sri Mulyani, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Francis Borgias Alip, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Elizabeth Arti Wulandari, Clarkson University, United States of America

REVIEWERS

• Arlene J. Yandug, Xavier University, Philippines
• Amporn Sa-ngiamwibool, Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University, Thailand
• Chrysogonus Sidhha Malilang, Malmo University, Sweden
• Gabriel Fajar Sasmita Aji, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Enny Anggraini, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Paulus Sarwoto, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Ria Lestari, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Elizabeth Arti Wulandari, Clarkson University, United States of America

EDITORS

• Arlene J. Yandug, Xavier University, Philippines
• Chrysogonus Sidhha Malilang, Malmo University, Sweden
• Hirmawan Wijanarka, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Arina Isti'anah, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Diksita Galuh Nirwinastu, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Anindita Dewangga Puri, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• E. Oseanita Pukan, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
• Almira Ghassani Sabhrina Romala, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia

Focus and Scope

Presenter Guidelines

Author Guidelines

• Abstracts and Papers must be submitted through OCS of Literary Studies Conference:  https://e-conf.usd.ac.id/index.php/lsc/lsc2021/schedConf/cfp
• Papers must be on language, literature, translation, or cultural studies.
• Articles must be in English, 2500 words (minimum), saved as Word Document (.doc/.docx) or Rich Text Format (.rtf).
• Papers should include (a) title; (b) name of author (with no academic title), e-mail, and institution; (c) abstract; (d) 3 or 4 keywords; (e) introduction, discussion, and conclusions, (f) references, and (g) appendices—optional.
• Abstracts should be prepared in English, 200 - 250 words.
• Abstracts should state (a) the purpose of the study, (b) basic procedures in the study, and (c) principal conclusions.
• Citation and Reference follow/adapt the APA format.

Abstract and Keywords

Abstract should stand alone, i.e. no citation in abstract. Consider it the advertisement of your article. Abstract should tell the prospective reader what you did and highlight the key findings. Avoid using technical jargon and uncommon abbreviations. You must be accurate, brief, clear and specific. Use words which reflect the precise meaning, Abstract should be precise and honest. Please follow word limitations (200-250 words).

On the abstract, explicitly include the introduction, objective of the papers, discussion/findings, and conclusion.

Below the abstract, rovide three to four keywords Each word/phrase in keyword should be separated by a semicolon (;) not a comma (,).

Paper Preparation Guidelines

Paper content should be organized in the following order: Title; Authors Name; Authors Affiliation; Abstract; Keywords; Introduction; Findings and Discussion; Conclusions; and References.

Paper Title

This is your opportunity to attract the reader's attention. Remember that readers are the potential authors who will cite your article. Identify the main issue of the paper. Begin with the subject of the paper. The title should be accurate, unambiguous, specific, and complete. Do not contain infrequently-used abbreviations. The title of the paper should be in 18 pt bold Cambria and be justified. The title should not be more than 20 words.

Author’s Name(s) and Affiliation(s)

Write Author(s) names without title and professional positions such as Prof, Dr, Production Manager, etc. Do not abbreviate your last/family name. Always give your First and Last names.

Write clear affiliation of all Authors. Affiliation includes: name of department/unit, (faculty), name of university, address, country.

Plagiarism Policy

LSC PROCEEDINGS recognize that plagiarism is not acceptable for all author and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) when plagiarism is identified by LSC anti-plagiarism software detection (we are using turnitin )  in an article that is submitted for publication.

“Plagiarism is copying another person’s text or ideas and passing the copied material as your own work. You must both delineate (i.e., separate and identify) the copied text from your text and give credit to (i.e., cite the source) the source of the copied text to avoid accusations of plagiarism.  Plagiarism is considered fraud and has potentially harsh consequences including loss of job, loss of reputation, and the assignation of reduced or failing grade in a course."

This definition of plagiarism applies for copied text and ideas:

1. Regardless of the source of the copied text or idea.
2. Regardless of whether the author(s) of the text or idea which you have copied actually copied that text or idea from another source.
3. Regardless of whether or not the authorship of the text or idea which you copy is known
4. Regardless of the nature of your text (journal paper/article, web page, book chapter, paper submitted for a college course, etc) into which you copy the text or idea
5. Regardless of whether or not the author of the source of the copied material gives permission for the material to be copied; and
6. Regardless of whether you are or are not the author of the source of the copied text or idea (self-plagiarism).

When plagiarism is identified by the Plagiarism Checker software, the Editorial Board responsible for the review of this paper and will agree on measures according to the extent of plagiarism detected in the article in agreement with the following guidelines:

Minor Plagiarism:

A small sentence or short paragraph of another manuscript is plagiarized without any significant data or idea taken from the other papers or publications.

(A warning is given to the authors and a request to change the manuscript and properly cite the original sources.)

Intermediate Plagiarism

A significant data, paragraph, or sentence of an article is plagiarized without proper citation to the original source.

(The submitted paper is automatically rejected)

Severe Plagiarism

A large portion of an article is plagiarized that involves many aspects such as reproducing original results (data, formulation, equation, law, statement, etc.), ideas, and methods presented in other publications.

(The paper is automatically rejected)