To submit your work, you'll need to follow the Author Guidelines. First, create an account, then log in to submit your abstract. You can only submit your full manuscript after the abstract has been submitted. All submissions are done online to ensure a smooth and accountable process. Please note that manuscripts may be returned without review if they don't meet submission requirements, are in the incorrect format, or cannot be downloaded. Finally, all submissions must be original work, and you must clearly disclose the contributions of all authors.

• The Scientific Committee first reviews new submissions to see if they're a good fit for the conference's subject matter and scope. They use a system called Manuscript Readiness Level (MRL) to make this determination.
• We cannot accept submissions that are poorly written, difficult to understand, or appear to be plagiarized. Please see our plagiarism policy for more details.
• Once an article passes the initial screening, it undergoes peer review by two independent reviewers.
• We follow single-blind review, the reviewers are aware of who the authors are, but the authors remain unaware of who is reviewing their work.
• Reviewer feedback is private; it will only be shared if the reviewers give their direct permission.
• The Scientific Committee will review the reviewer's feedback and explain it to the authors. If revisions are requested, the corresponding author has two weeks to submit the updated manuscript.
• The Scientific Committee makes the final decision after reviewing the information gathered during the peer-review process.
• We keep all submitted manuscripts private until they're published, following our established publication ethics.

• The authors must present motivation, significance, and practical applications of their work.
• It is important for the authors to introduce original concepts, new derivations, or previously unexplored applications, particularly those that have received little or no in-depth attention.
• The literature review focuses on identifying unaddressed areas in the research area, drawing exclusively from sources published from 2020 to the present.
• The research methodology details the chosen approach, which could be analytical, numerical, experimental, or a mixed. highlighting the authors' specific contributions, the assumptions and/or approximations made, and for experimental studies, a thorough description of the apparatus, its limitations, and the precise steps of the experiments.
• The quality of the results and the depth and logic of the discussion will be critically evaluated.
• Key takeaways and suggestions for future work must be stated.
• The content must be presented in clear and accessible English, making the ideas easy to grasp and demonstrating a high level of grammatical accuracy and freedom from typographical errors.

During peer review, editors decide among three outcomes: Reject, Revision required, or Accept submission.

• Reject submission Based on peer review, the paper has been declined, and resubmission is not permitted.
• Revision required.The article needs revisions before a final decision. Authors must improve their submission based on reviewer feedback and resubmit within two weeks. The revised article may undergo additional peer review, and if it does not meet the scientific committee's satisfaction, it could still be rejected.
• Accept submission. The paper is accepted for publication, but it is still subject to minor revisions and copy-editing to align with our requirements. After a final check by the editorial office, acceptance will be confirmed, and the paper will proceed to the publisher.
• Galley Proof. The corresponding author will receive the galley proof for final review. At this stage, corrections are limited to minor text, equation, or grammatical changes, which will be confirmed with the author. Authors must return the proof to the scientific committee within three days, as they are responsible for reviewing its content.