Plagiarism Policy

Our policy at InCASST strictly enforces zero tolerance for plagiarism. We have established clear guidelines detailing the consequences when an article submitted for publication is identified as plagiarized. Plagiarism is defined as taking someone else's words or ideas and presenting them as if they were your own.

This policy requires all submitted papers to be new, original work that hasn't appeared in print before or isn't currently being considered for publication. When incorporating text directly from another source, it's crucial to distinguish it from your own writing through proper indentation, the use of quotation marks, and explicit identification of the original source.

You need permission from the copyright holder (and ideally the original author) to reproduce any text longer than two or three sentences, or any graphic material, from another source. You also must cite your source, noting where the material was previously published.

Every paper submitted will be scanned by Turnitin for plagiarism. If plagiarism is found, the Scientific Committee will review the paper and decide on appropriate actions based on the severity of the plagiarism, following established guidelines:
  1. Similarity Index > 40%: Rejected. The article was rejected with no possibility of resubmission because of significant issues with citations and/or paraphrasing.
  2. Similarity Index 15% ≥ sim ≥ 40%: Resubmission. You need to cite all sources for any information you paraphrase, even if you've already provided a citation for the original text. 
  3. Similarity index < 15%:  Accepted. You always need to cite all external sources you use.
  4. For cases 2 and 3, you need to thoroughly revise their article, ensuring all necessary citations are added and any borrowed text is properly paraphrased. You should then resubmit the article along with an updated Turnitin report.

 

">
#6-2-2025 - 15.02 PM perubahan pola bermain digital terlihat semakin konsisten di awal tahun ini pengamatan awal 2026 mengungkap cara baru pemain mengatur ritme evaluasi perilaku digital menunjukkan pendekatan bermain lebih terkendali studi tren mengarah pada pola bermain yang lebih stabil dan terukur pendekatan sistematis mulai menggantikan gaya bermain agresif analisis awal tahun mengungkap pergeseran preferensi pemain digital data lapangan menunjukkan pemain lebih fokus menjaga ritme sesi fenomena bermain konsisten menjadi sorotan di kalangan pemain berpengalaman riset perilaku digital mengarah pada strategi yang lebih tertata pendekatan adaptif dinilai membantu pemain menghadapi dinamika sesi banyak pemain tidak lagi mengejar intensitas tinggi di awal 2026 cara pemain menyikapi perubahan ritme mulai menarik perhatian pendekatan bertahap dinilai memberi ruang membaca pola dengan lebih tenang analisis tren digital menunjukkan konsistensi semakin dihargai perubahan kecil dalam ritme bermain mulai memberi dampak besar mengelola tempo menjadi fokus baru pemain digital tahun ini studi awal mengungkap alasan pemain lebih menjaga stabilitas pendekatan bermain terkontrol mulai menggeser gaya lama data awal tahun memperlihatkan cara pemain menghindari tekanan berlebih awal tahun ini menjadi momen evaluasi cara bermain digital